Wright Please enjoy exploring the varied views of the historical Jesus offered up by these authors through the links above. The rest of this page will make some comment on the titular groups in which I have categorized the authors' theories.
Second, involvement with Social Security Administration, in most cases, is contract based. The purpose of forming a contract between two or more parties is to bind the parties related to it to the contract to the terms and conditions of the contract.
If I was a farmer contracting for harvesting of my crops, I would first find an available harvester and contract with them to timely harvest my crops. The contract would include a limitation that the harvester needs a months notice if I want to cancel the harvest for any reason.
So now it comes to two weeks before the harvest and my crops are destroyed by a hail storm but I have no act of God clause in the contract. What happens when I tell the harvester not to come. He says that he will try to sell the time to someone else but that if he cannot he will still have to bill me for the harvest because I am not canceling before the one month deadline.
I rescind my signature from the contract and refuse to pay. What happens when the harvester takes me to court for specific performance on the harvest contract. The harvester presents the contract to allow it to speak for itself.
Then he presents my affidavit of rescinded signature to prove that I believed that my signature existed on the contract or I would not have attempted to rescind it.
The court rules in favor of the Contract for the following causes: Nothing I could say or do would free me from the terms shown here. The contract is valid and must be paid. This little fictitious scenario is exemplary of any contractual obligation situation wherein a person attempts to rescind their signature.
In the Mythology regarding this point people argue that they were not fully informed as to the true nature of the contractual liability and therefore their signature was not valid.
They allege that the other principle of the contract withheld information in order to perpetrate a fraud; further, they cite the limitation that one cannot sign without knowing willing consent and if they had known the true nature of the relationship they would never have signed the instrument.
Or, they allege that the contract was created before they were born and that no person under eighteen years old can enter or be entered into a contract because they do not have the legal capacity to agree to enter and be bound by contract.
Though all of these alleged causes to rescind sound reasonable and are supportable with law, the fact is their application is foolhardy. Note the other parties position: The Social Security Administration's operation and intent is fully disclosed publicly with full notice and as such was available prior to your participation.
Therefore, if you did not do due diligence in your discovery to understand your participation and the obligation to the same once you were involved that is not their problem nor is it cause for eliminating the contract's liability. Further, if the contract was made by a guardian while the named party was underage, they continued to participate under the contractual liability when they came of age which participation was a knowing willing consensual signature act binding the party to the contract without right to rescind.
The only thing rescinding such a contractual obligation does is prove the person's signature on the contract. The Second Amendment protects the personal right to keep and bear Arms We have never seen a Supreme Court case alleging a Second Amendment Right to personally keep and bear arms prove successful.
There was a case that stated that a shotgun was not a Militia type weapon so it was not protected under the Second Amendment secured rights.
Remember, there is no such thing as a Constitutional Right and if you do not know what your rights are, you don't have them. But, what is being stated about the right of the people to keep and bear Arms? This is why the United States Supreme Court rulings are consistent in that the Second Amendment secured right is relevant only to the necessary existence of the Militia.
Therefore, when a person stands to proclaim they have a right to keep and bear Arms, not recognizing the related Militia necessity, they most often lose their case.
We are not saying that the private Right to keep and bear Arms is not protected. We are simply stating that Right is not stated in the Second Amendment.
That right is reserved from governmental control in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. They chose to change the Second Amendment to exclude mentioning such private rights thereby excluding them wholly from governmental legislative control by leaving them under the blanket protection of the Ninth Amendment.
This must be remembered before we go on to discussing gun rights and how such corporate governance contractually removes them. To address the common misunderstanding at the core of gun right legislation today we present the following: For that reason, Congress today passes statutory controls over licensed gun ownership and use.
But, such controls are functional over the contracted gun use of registered gun owners.
|Cosmic Rays Reveal Mysterious Chamber Inside the Great Pyramid||Mainstream scholarship holds that Galatians 4: Mainstream scholarship holds that it recalls the earthly life of Jesus "in the context of cultic rites that assumed his divinity.|
|Patriot Mythology||An Ideological Analysis of the Myth of Heracles.|
|The Solution:||Visit Website Late that night, two trains departed Richmond heading south. Union officials also estimated the value of the Confederate fortune in the millions of dollars, hoping to spur along the Federal troops seeking the fugitive Davis and his government.|
This is the underlying limitation that swelters beneath a recent action reported to us in Denver, Colorado where a political candidate carried a gun to a rally as a political statement and was charged and convicted with a gun carry violation.
In the newspapers and radio commentaries attorneys alleged that the Constitutions of Colorado and the United States were abandoned because Denver is under home rule. That is not a correct appraisal of the matter.
Home rule does not eliminate proper application of a State's constitution or of the Constitution of the United States of America.
The fact that the gun itself was evidence in the case and that the man carrying it was a registered owner of the same binds that man to the local rules by contract. Wherefore it is well ruled that his private rights, though lawfully secured, are not applicable in this case because he voluntarily contracted to a higher standard via his registered gun ownership and use.Theories of Myth, a companion to the author's World Mythology: An Annotated Guide to Collections and Anthologies (Scarecrow Press and Salem Press, ), has been written to serve the needs of college undergraduates, high school students, and general readers approaching the study of myth for the first time.
Archetypal/Myth Criticism. A form of criticism based largely on the works of C. G. Jung (YOONG) and Joseph Campbell (and myth itself). Some of the school's major figures include Robert Graves, Francis Fergusson, Philip Wheelwright, Leslie Fiedler, Northrop Frye, Maud Bodkin, and G.
Wilson Knight. Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. The purpose of this web page is to explain and explore some of the theories offered up by contemporary scholars on the historical Jesus and the origins of the Christian religion.
A skeptical look at the welter of nonsense, misinformation, and disinformation surrounding the murder of JFK. Debunks various myths.
The Myth of Religious Neutrality: An Essay on the Hidden Role of Religious Belief in Theories, Revised Edition [Roy A.
Clouser] on attheheels.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Written for undergraduates, the educated layperson, and scholars in fields other than philosophy, The Myth of Religious Neutrality offers a radical reinterpretation of the general relations between religion.